
GERENAL WESLEY CLARK EXPLAINS HOW THE USA PLANS TO ATTACK SOME COUNTRIES. U.S.A LIKES TO GO WAR IN NAME OF THE PEACE AND CREATE MANY EXCUSES TO MAKE PEOPLE BELEAVE IN THEIR Imperialistic POLITICS… REPRESENTED BY U.S.A
Video: 1383

GERENAL WESLEY CLARK EXPLAINS HOW THE USA PLANS TO ATTACK SOME COUNTRIES. U.S.A LIKES TO GO WAR IN NAME OF THE PEACE AND CREATE MANY EXCUSES TO MAKE PEOPLE BELEAVE IN THEIR Imperialistic POLITICS… REPRESENTED BY U.S.A
Video: 1383
The organisation alleges that opponents of Muammar Gaddafi were subjected to the torture at secret CIA prisons
Human Rights Watch (HRW) has accused the US government of covering up the extent of waterboarding at secret CIA prisons, alleging that Libyan opponents of Muammar Gaddafi were subjected to the torture before being handed over to the former dictator’s security police.
The New York-based human rights group has cast “serious doubt” on Washington’s claim that only three people, all members of al-Qaida, were waterboarded in American custody, claiming in a new report to have fresh evidence that the CIA used the technique to simulate drowning on Libyans snatched from countries in Africa and Asia.
The report, Delivered into Enemy Hands: US-Led Abuse and Rendition of Opponents to Gaddafi’s Libya, also says that the CIA, Britain’s MI6 and other western intelligence services were responsible for “delivering Gaddafi his enemies on a silver platter” by sending the captured men to Tripoli for further abuse after the American interrogations.
The HRW report is based on documents seized at the Libyan intelligence headquarters after Gaddafi’s fall, and interviews with 14 former detainees, mostly members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which attempted for 20 years to overthrow the former regime in Tripoli. The group joined last year’s revolution and some of those tortured by the US now hold leadership positions in the new Libyan administration.
Last week the US attorney general, Eric Holder, said that no one would be prosecuted for CIA abuses during the Bush administration’s “war on terror” despite the death of at least two detainees under torture. But HRW said the latest revelations merit new independent inquiries in the US and Britain. It said Washington’s failure to hold to account Americans responsible for torture undermines US demands for accountability for crimes by others in Syria and Libya.
Among those tortured was Khalid al-Sharif, who was held for two years in CIA-run detention centres in Afghanistan before being handed over to Gaddafi in 2005. He is now head of the Libyan National Guard.
“I spent three months getting interrogated heavily during the first period [in US custody] and they gave me a different type of torture every day. Sometimes they used water, sometimes not,” he told HRW. “Sometimes they put a hood over my head and they lay me down and they started to put water in my mouth … They poured the water over my mouth and nose so I had the feeling that I was drowning. I couldn’t breathe … I tried to turn my head left and right as much as I could to take in some gulps of breath. I felt as if I was suffocating.”
Sharif told HRW a doctor was present who would tell the interrogators when to stop the abuse and when to continue.
Detained alongside Sharif was Mohammed al-Shoroeiya. He told HRW he was waterboarded numerous times.
“He said he felt like each time lasted about three minutes but said there was no way to really tell time,” the HRW report states. “When told that the United States had admitted to doing this to a few people for between 20 and 40 seconds each time, he said he was sure his sessions were definitely longer than that.
“He said there were doctors present. He knows they were doctors because his leg was broken while he was there and he was treated by these same people. The doctors would monitor him as the cold water was poured on him, and when his body temperature got too low, they would order warm water be added to the cold. Once his temperature was okay, they would begin adding cold water again.”
HRW said the testimony contradicts assertions in Washington about who was subject to the drowning technique, which the Bush administration claimed was not torture.
“The allegations cast serious doubts on prior assertions from US government officials that only three people were waterboarded in US custody,” said HRW. “They also reflect just how little the public still knows about what went on in the US secret detention programme.”
The report contains documents, some of which it said are being made public for the first time, found abandoned in the offices of former Libyan intelligence chief, Moussa Koussa, after Gaddafi was overthrown.
“The documents include communications between Moussa Koussa’s office and the CIA, and between Koussa’s office and MI6,” the report said. “They show a high level of cooperation between the United States, the United Kingdom and the government of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi on the transfer of Gaddafi’s opponents into Libyan custody. The documents are significant because they shed light on the still opaque CIA renditions programme, identify former detainees by name, and provide corroborating evidence in several specific cases, most notably confirming the involvement of the US, the UK, and other governments.
“Ten of the 14 Libyans interviewed for this report were rendered back to Libya within about year of the date when Libya, the United States and the United Kingdom had formally mended their relations. The mending of relations was very publicly marked by a visit from the British prime minister at the time, Tony Blair, to Libya on 25 March, 2004. The collusion is ironic, given that years later these same governments would end up assisting Gaddafi’s opponents in their efforts to overthrow the Libyan leader. Several of those opponents are now in leadership positions and are important political actors in Libya.”
HRW said the treatment of the Libyans sheds light on the Bush administration’s failure to distinguish between Islamists responsible for the 9/11 attacks and “those who may simply have been engaged in armed opposition against their own repressive regimes”.
“This failure risked aligning the United States with brutal dictators and aided their efforts to dismiss all political opponents as terrorists,” it said.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/06/human-rights-watch-us-waterboarding
human rights watch:
http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/09/05/us-torture-and-rendition-gaddafi-s-libya
Thursday 6 September 2012 05:35
SABC
Feedback on the accord will be given to the miners this morning. (SABC)
A peace accord to find an amicable solution to the labour dispute at Lonmin’s Marikana mine was signed last night. The accord was signed by the Department of Labour, The National Union of Mineworkers and two other trade unions, UASA and Solidarity, at the Rustenburg Civic Centre in the North West province.
The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union, AMCU, did not sign the peace accord, but their representatives were present. The accord commits the strikers to return to work by Monday and the Lonmin mine to negotiate the workers R12 500 pay demand.
Government mediation talks re-opened yesterday with the aim of ending the illegal strike action which has led to 44 deaths at the mine. The talks went on until midnight and the miners had already left the venue for home when the agreement was signed. The miners are yet to sign it.
The accord also states that peace should prevail during negotiations and that peace and stability at the mine should be restored.
The president of the trade union federation, Cosatu, says they are optimistic that the striking miners will sign the peace accord.
Once the peace accord has been signed by the striking mines a date will be set for negotiations to commence, which will be facilitated by the CCMA.
Once all the parties have signed, all the unions will be included in the existing wage agreement, including AMCU.
The president of the trade union federation, Cosatu, says they are optimistic that the striking miners will sign the peace accord.
Strike leaders are expected to analyse the peace accord and give feedback to the other miners this morning, near the Koppie where 34 of their colleagues were gunned down by police three weeks ago.
Thursday 6 September 2012 11:08
SABC
Rock-drill operators’ salary is R6 000 a month.(SABC)
The Chamber of Mines has come to the defence of Lonmin in the North West where ongoing strike action and violence have been occurring.
The chamber believes the R12 500 salary demand by striking miners at Marikana is unreasonable. Miners say they will not go back to work until their demand for the salary-hike has been met. The Chamber’s Vusi Mabena says the strike came at a time that the platinum sector is experiencing difficulties.
Mabena says the strike on its own is a great blow to the sector. He says rock-drill operators’ salary is R6 000 a month, not more than that.
“Demanding a take home salary of R12 500, they are basically asking for a gross salary of R20 000 and if you aceed to a demand like that for a rock driller, then you want to close the mine. The platinum industry was already going through difficult times when this strike came. We are looking at ways to cease the situation,” says Mabena.
Thursday 6 September 2012 06:06
SABC
Struggle hero Steve Biko. (SABC)
September marks Biko month, remembering his life and sacrifice to his country. South Africans are being urged to remember the struggle hero Steve Biko.
Steve Biko was the leader of the black consciousness movement and an author. He was detained and tortured by the apartheid police in 1977 and later died at age 30, after suffering brain damage.
The foundation, keeping his legacy alive says, young people can learn a lot from Biko. Director of the Biko Foundation, Obenewa Amponsah, says: “His writing were in his early years, this says to young people they can do something to change their own destiny and that of the country.”
To commemorate his life, special events will be held country wide. The Biko annual lecture will be delivered by renowned African poet and novelist Professor Ben Okri.
“His work turns to focus on culture, identity, heritage and how they relate to the development agenda so he is in the tradition of Biko,” says Amponsah on Okri.
A Biko multi-purpose center will be officially opened this month in King William’s Town.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNmAcgdO2Ck
The most potent weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed.
Steven Biko
Being black is not a matter of pigmentation – being black is a reflection of a mental attitude.
Steven Biko
You are either alive and proud or you are dead, and when you are dead, you can’t care anyway.
Steven Biko
Merely by describing yourself as black you have started on a road towards emancipation, you have committed yourself to fight against all forces that seek to use your blackness as a stamp that marks you out as a subservient being.
Steven Biko
Black Consciousness is an attitude of the mind and a way of life, the most positive call to emanate from the black world for a long time.
Steven Biko
So as a prelude whites must be made to realise that they are only human, not superior. Same with Blacks. They must be made to realise that they are also human, not inferior.
Steven Biko
The basic tenet of black consciousness is that the black man must reject all value systems that seek to make him a foreigner in the country of his birth and reduce his basic human dignity.
Steven Biko
Black man, you are on your own.
Steven Biko
It becomes more necessary to see the truth as it is if you realize that the only vehicle for change are these people who have lost their personality.
Steven Biko
In time, we shall be in a position to bestow on South Africa the greatest possible gift – a more human face.
Read more at
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/s/steven_biko.html#msHEzyeWOeTlSM8X.99
Steve Biko ( 1946-1977 ) est un militant noir d’Afrique du Sud. C’est l’une des grandes figures de la lutte anti-apartheid. Arrêté en août 1977, il est torturé puis transféré à Pretoria. Sa mort en prison souleva l’indignation internationale qui aboutit à la condamnation, à l’ONU, du régime sud-africain. Son meurtre est resté impuni.

— with Mark E. Bryan, Danny Mills, Chuck Charliecharlez and Laird Racette.
As the war drums are beating even louder, imagine the situation was reversed, and Iran — or any other country — did a fraction of what America and Israel do at will.

By Noam Chomsky
Alternet
3 September 2012
Video: If Iran had nuclear weapons most Arab people would feel safer.
Iran is carrying out a murderous and destructive low-level war against Israel with great-power participation. Its leaders announce that negotiations are going nowhere. Israel refuses to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty and allow inspections, as Iran has done.
Israel continues to defy the overwhelming international call for a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the region. Throughout, Iran enjoys the support of its superpower patron.
Iranian leaders are therefore announcing their intention to bomb Israel, and prominent Iranian military analysts report that the attack may happen before the US elections.
Iran can use its powerful air force and new submarines sent by Germany, armed with nuclear missiles and stationed off the coast of Israel. Whatever the timetable, Iran is counting on its superpower backer to join if not lead the assault. US defense secretary Leon Panetta says that while we do not favor such an attack, as a sovereign country Iran will act in its best interests.
All unimaginable, of course, though it is actually happening, with the cast of characters reversed. True, analogies are never exact, and this one is unfair – to Iran.
Like its patron, Israel resorts to violence at will. It persists in illegal settlement in occupied territory, some annexed, all in brazen defiance of international law and the UN Security Council. It has repeatedly carried out brutal attacks against Lebanon and the imprisoned people of Gaza, killing tens of thousands without credible pretext.
Thirty years ago Israel destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor, an act that has recently been praised, avoiding the strong evidence, even from US intelligence, that the bombing did not end Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program but rather initiated it. Bombing of Iran might have the same effect.
Iran too has carried out aggression – but during the past several hundred years, only under the US-backed regime of the Shah, when it conquered Arab islands in the Persian Gulf.
Iran engaged in nuclear development programs under the Shah, with the strong support of official Washington. The Iranian government is brutal and repressive, as are Washington’s allies in the region. The most important ally, Saudi Arabia, is the most extreme Islamic fundamentalist regime, and spends enormous funds spreading its radical Wahhabist doctrines elsewhere. The gulf dictatorships, also favored US allies, have harshly repressed any popular effort to join the Arab Spring.
The Nonaligned Movement – the governments of most of the world’s population – is now meeting in Teheran. The group has vigorously endorsed Iran’s right to enrich uranium, and some members – India, for example – adhere to the harsh US sanctions program only partially and reluctantly.
The NAM delegates doubtless recognize the threat that dominates discussion in the West, lucidly articulated by Gen. Lee Butler, former head of the US Strategic Command: “It is dangerous in the extreme that in the cauldron of animosities that we call the Middle East,” one nation should arm itself with nuclear weapons, which “inspires other nations to do so.”
Butler is not referring to Iran, but to Israel, which is regarded in the Arab countries and in Europe as posing the greatest threat to peace In the Arab world, the United States is ranked second as a threat, while Iran, though disliked, is far less feared. Indeed in many polls majorities hold that the region would be more secure if Iran had nuclear weapons to balance the threats they perceive.
If Iran is indeed moving toward nuclear-weapons capability – this is still unknown to US intelligence – that may be because it is “inspired to do so” by the US-Israeli threats, regularly issued in explicit violation of the UN Charter.
Why then is Iran the greatest threat to world peace, as seen in official Western discourse? The primary reason is acknowledged by US military and intelligence and their Israeli counterparts: Iran might deter the resort to force by the United States and Israel.
Furthermore Iran must be punished for its “successful defiance,” which was Washington’s charge against Cuba half a century ago, and still the driving force for the US assault against Cuba that continues despite international condemnation.
Other events featured on the front pages might also benefit from a different perspective. Suppose that Julian Assange had leaked Russian documents revealing important information that Moscow wanted to conceal from the public, and that circumstances were otherwise identical.
Sweden would not hesitate to pursue its sole announced concern, accepting the offer to interrogate Assange in London. It would declare that if Assange returned to Sweden (as he has agreed to do), he would not be extradited to Russia, where chances of a fair trial would be slight.
Sweden would be honored for this principled stand. Assange would be praised for performing a public service – which, of course, would not obviate the need to take the accusations against him as seriously as in all such cases.
The most prominent news story of the day here is the US election. An appropriate perspective was provided by US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who held that “We may have democracy in this country, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we cannot have both.”
Guided by that insight, coverage of the election should focus on the impact of wealth on policy, extensively analyzed in the recent study “Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America” by Martin Gilens. He found that the vast majority are “powerless to shape government policy” when their preferences diverge from the affluent, who pretty much get what they want when it matters to them.
Small wonder, then, that in a recent ranking of the 31 members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in terms of social justice, the United States placed 27th, despite its extraordinary advantages.
Or that rational treatment of issues tends to evaporate in the electoral campaign, in ways sometimes verging on comedy.
To take one case, Paul Krugman reports that the much-admired Big Thinker of the Republican Party, Paul Ryan, declares that he derives his ideas about the financial system from a character in a fantasy novel – “Atlas Shrugged” – who calls for the use of gold coins instead of paper currency.
It only remains to draw from a really distinguished writer, Jonathan Swift. In “Gulliver’s Travels,” his sages of Lagado carry all their goods with them in packs on their backs, and thus could use them for barter without the encumbrance of gold. Then the economy and democracy could truly flourish – and best of all, inequality would sharply decline, a gift to the spirit of Justice Brandeis.
OccupyList.org
global directory of
occupations, media & links
http://occupylist.org/index.php?option=com_jreviews&view=category&Itemid=101

We are living in a world controlled by forces incapable of giving freedom and dignity to the world’s population. A world where we are told “there is no alternative” to the loss of rights gained through the long, hard struggles of our ancestors, and where success is defined in opposition to the most fundamental values of humanity, such as solidarity and mutual support. Moreover, anything that does not promote competitiveness, selfishness and greed is seen as dysfunctional.
But we have not remained silent! From Tunisia to Tahrir Square, Madrid to Reykjavik, New York to Brussels, people are rising up to denounce the status quo. Our effort states “enough!”, and has begun to push changes forward, worldwide.
This is why we are uniting once again to make our voices heard all over the world this 12 May.
We condemn the current distribution of economic resources whereby only a tiny minority escape poverty and insecurity, and future generations are condemned to a poisoned legacy thanks to the environmental crimes of the rich and powerful. “Democratic” political systems, where they exist, have been emptied of meaning, put to the service of those few interested in increasing the power of corporations and financial institutions.
The current crisis is not a natural accident; it was caused by the greed of those who would bring the world down, with the help of an economics that is no longer about management of the common good, but has become an ideology at the service of financial power.
We have awakened, and not just to complain! We aim to pinpoint the true causes of the crisis, and to propose alternatives.
The statement below does not speak on behalf of everyone in the global spring/Occupy/Take the Square movements. It is an attempt by some inside the movements to reconcile statements written and endorsed in the different assemblies around the world. The process of writing the statement was consensus-based, open to all, and regularly announced on our international communications platforms. It was a hard and long process, full of compromises; this statement is offered to people’s assemblies around the world for discussions, revisions and endorsements. It is a work in progress.
We do not make demands from governments, corporations or parliament members, which some of us see as illegitimate, unaccountable or corrupt. We speak to the people of the world, both inside and outside our movements.
We want another world, and such a world is possible:
1. The economy must be put to the service of people’s welfare, and to support and serve the environment, not private profit. We want a system where labour is appreciated by its social utility, not its financial or commercial profit. Therefore, we demand:• Free and universal access to health, education from primary school through higher education and housing for all human beings. We reject outright the privatisation of public services management, and the use of these essential services for private profit.
• Full respect for children’s rights, including free childcare for everyone.
• Retirement/pension so we may have dignity at all ages. Mandatory universal sick leave and holiday pay.• Every human being should have access to an adequate income for their livelihood, so we ask for work or, alternatively, universal basic income guarantee.
• Corporations should be held accountable to their actions. For example, corporate subsidies and tax cuts should be done away with if said company outsources jobs to decrease salaries, violates the environment or the rights of workers.
• Apart from bread, we want roses. Everyone has the right to enjoy culture, participate in a creative and enriching leisure at the service of the progress of humankind. Therefore, we demand the progressive reduction of working hours, without reducing income.
• Food sovereignty through sustainable farming should be promoted as an instrument of food security for the benefit of all. This should include an indefinite moratorium on the production and marketing of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and immediate reduction of agrochemicals use.
• We demand policies that function under the understanding that our changing patterns of life should be organic/ecologic or should never be. These policies should be based on a simple rule: one should not spoil the balance of ecosystems for simple profit. Violations of this policy should be prosecuted around the world as an environmental crime, with severe sanctions for those convicted.
• Policies to promote the change from fossil fuels to renewable energy, through massive investment which should help to change the production model.
• We demand the creation of international environmental standards, mandatory for countries, companies, corporations, and individuals. Ecocide (wilful damage to the environment, ecosystems, biodiversity) should be internationally recognised as a crime of the greatest magnitude.
2. To achieve these objectives, we believe that the economy should be run democratically at all levels, from local to global. People must get democratic control over financial institutions, transnational corporations and their lobbies. To this end, we demand:• Control and regulation of financial speculation by abolishing tax havens, and establishing a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT). As long as they exist, the IMF, World Bank and the Basel Committee on Banking Regulation must be radically democratised. Their duty from now on should be fostering economic development based on democratic decision making. Rich governments cannot have more votes because they are rich. International institutions must be controlled by the principle that each human is equal to all other humans – African, Argentinian or American; Greek or German.
• As long as they exist, radical reform and democratisation of the global trading system and the World Trade Organization must take place. Commercialisation of life and resources, as well as wage and trade dumping between countries must stop.
• We want democratic control of the global commons, defined as the natural resources and economic institutions essential for a proper economic management. These commons are: water, energy, air, telecommunications and a fair and stable economic system. In all these cases, decisions must be accountable to citizens and ensure their interests, not the interests of a small minority of financial elite.
• As long as social inequalities exist, taxation at all levels should maintain the principle of solidarity. Those who have more should contribute to maintain services for the collective welfare. Maximum income should be limited, and minimum income set to reduce the outrageous social divisions in our societies and its social political and economic effects.
• No more money to rescue banks. As long as debt exists, following the examples of Ecuador and Iceland, we demand a social audit of the debts owed by countries. Illegitimate debt owed to financial institutions should not be paid.
• An absolute end to fiscal austerity policies that only benefit a minority, and cause great suffering to the majority.
• As long as banks exist, separation of commercial and financial banks, avoiding banks that are “too big to fail”.
• An end to the legal personhood of corporations. Companies cannot be elevated to the same level of rights as people. The public’s right to protect workers, citizens and the environment should prevail over the protections of private property or investment.
3. We believe that political systems must be fully democratic. We therefore demand full democratisation of international institutions, and the elimination of the veto power of a few governments. We want a political system which really represent the variety and diversity of our societies:• All decisions affecting all mankind should be taken in democratic forums like a participatory and direct UN parliamentary assembly or a UN people’s assembly, not rich clubs such as G20 or G8.
• At all levels we ask for the development of a democracy that is as participatory as possible, including non representative direct democracy .
• As long as they are practised, electoral systems should be as fair and representative as possible, avoiding biases that distort the principle of proportionality.
• We call for the democratisation of access and management of media. These should serve to educate the public, as opposed to the creation of an artificial consensus about unjust policies.
• We ask for democracy in companies and corporations. Workers, despite wage level or gender, should have real decision-making power in the companies and corporations they work in. We want to promote co-operative companies and corporations, as real democratic economic institutions.
• Zero tolerance of corruption in economic policy. We must stop the excessive influence of big business in politics, which is today a major threat to true democracy.
• We demand complete freedom of expression, assembly and demonstration, as well as the cessation of attempts to censor the internet.
• We demand respect for privacy rights on and off the internet. Companies and the government should not engage in data mining.
• We believe that military spending is politically counterproductive to a society’s advance, so we demand its reduction to a minimum.
• Ethnic, cultural and sexual minorities should have their civil, cultural, political and economic rights fully recognised.
• Some of us believe a new Universal Declaration of Human Rights, fit for the 21st century, written in a participatory, direct and democratic way, needs to be written. As long as the current Declaration of Human Rights defines our rights, it must be enforced in relation to all – in both rich and poor countries. Implementing institutions that force compliance and penalise violators need to be established, such as a global court to prosecute social, economic and environmental crimes perpetrated by governments, corporations and individuals. At all levels, local, national, regional and global, new constitutions for political institutions need to be considered, as in Iceland or in some Latin American countries. Justice and law must work for all, otherwise justice is not justice, and law is not law.
This is a worldwide global spring. We will be there and we will fight until we win. We will not stop being people. We are not numbers. We are free women and men.
For a global spring!
For global democracy and social justice!
Take to the streets in May 2012!
http://occupythe99percent.com/2012/05/may-12th-globalmay-statement/
Tuesday 4 September 2012 19:11
SABC
The Human Rights Committee will review the Prevention and Combatting of Torture of Persons Bill (SABC)
The Human Rights Committee says allegations of torture in police custody on Lonmin miners prove the urgency of proper legislation on this issue.
The Prevention and Combatting of Torture of Persons Bill is currently in process. Submissions on the Bill were made in the public hearings of the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development, today.
“It was the torture of Steve Biko that gave the impetus for the drafting of the convention against torture as South Africa’s most famous torture victim’s brutal death had sent shock-waves around the world,” says Lesireka Letsebe of Lawyers for Human Rights.
In recent weeks, miners arrested during the Marikana shootings alleged that they were being tortured by police officers in the holding cells. This signals that the issue of torture in custody that occurred 35 years ago has not gone away.
Torture has always been a crime
Today, the Human Right’s Commission expressed its horror to Parliament. South Africa currently has no law aimed specifically at combatting torture, even though the country is a signatory to this United Nations convention.
One submission suggested that the Bill be implemented retrospectively to the date of signature in December, 1998.
“We are not creating a new crime. Torture has always been a crime. Members of the public are still shocked that torture is not a crime,” says Kathleen Hardy from the University of the Witwatersrand’s Center for Applied Legal Studies.
Another presentation asked for police to be held liable when victims of continuous domestic abuse are not protected properly. MPs will now deliberate on submissions and how they can be incorporated into the legislation.
Tuesday 4 September 2012 16:21
Frank Nxumalo
The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) supports the miner’s R12500 wage request(SABC)
The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) says it will support talks around platinum miners’ demands for a R12 500.
The demand is at the centre of a four-week-old illegal and violent strike by platinum mine workers at Lonmin’s Marikana, in the North Westprovince, that culminated in the death of 34 of their colleagues.
“We do not have any objections and we cannot say it is too much. If workers say this is what will satisfy us, so be it. The issue is for Lonmin mine management to decide,” says NUM General Secretary, Frans Baleni.
“We cannot say it is too much, it is up to mine to say whether they can afford such a demand.”
NUM President, Senzeni Zokwana, recently undertook a mission to Canada to study the salary grading of mineworkers.
“Following this study, I can say that the amount that rock drillers are earning is far less than the extremes they are exposed to. It has been companies that have refused to entertain workers’ demands. If this demand can be looked at, NUM will consider it,” says Zokwana.
Tuesday 4 September 2012 05:48
SABC
Lonmin mine workers have embarked on a crippling wage strike. (SABC)
Management at the Lonmin mine in Marikana have denied reports that there is a stalemate in its peace negotiations with stakeholders. The talks have been postponed to today.
The department of labour and the CCMA have failed to convince the majority of miners to go back to work. Only 4% of the 28 000 strong force have reported for duty. The strikers say they want their wage issues to be addressed first.
Yesterday, trade union AMCU did not attend the latest round of talks, saying it had been sidelined. The union walked out of the negotiations at the Rustenburg Civic Centre on two occasions last week. Mine management says not all strikers are employed by the mine and it wants this to be investigated.
Meanwhile, the case against the arrested Marikana mineworkers has been postponed to February next year. The National Prosecuting Authority provisionally withdrew murder and attempted murder charges against them. 162 of the 270 miners were released yesterday after spending three weeks in various holding cells.
They were arrested when police shot and killed 34 of their colleagues. Their relatives celebrated their arrival with a cleansing ceremony.
The miners say they will remain steadfast in their demand for a R12 500 salary. The charges they are now facing include illegal possession of dangerous weapons, illegal possession of firearms and public violence. The remaining miners that are still in custody are expected to be released on Thursday.
The NPA meanwhile says murder charges could be re-instituted once investigations have been completed.
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.